首页 / 院系成果 / 成果详情页

A randomized multicenter phase II trial of mecapegfilgrastim single administration versus granulocyte colony-stimulating growth factor on treating chemotherapy-induced neutropenia in breast cancer patients  期刊论文  

  • 编号:
    c0c43132-d0c4-425e-a92b-d695f46aa543
  • 作者:
    Wang, Tao[1] Wu, Biao[2] Hui, Xichun[3] Liu, Jinping[4] Zhang, Tao[5] Li, Funian[6] Sun, Bing[1] Cai, Li[7] Li, Xinzheng[8] Chen, Zhiyue[9] Yang, Qing[9] Jiang, Zefei[1]
  • 语种:
    英文
  • 期刊:
    ANNALS OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE ISSN:2305-5839 2019 年 7 卷 9 期 ; MAY
  • 收录:
  • 关键词:
  • 摘要:

    Background: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of mecapegfilgrastim (HHPG-19K) with different doses compared to granulocyte colony-stimulating growth factor (G-CSF) in treating chemotherapy-induced neutropenia in breast cancer patients.
    Methods: A total of 182 breast cancer patients were enrolled in this multi-center, randomized, phase II trial and developed neutropenia after first cycle chemotherapy. Patients were then assigned as 1:1:1 ratio to receive 100 mu g/kg HHPG-19K single injection (HHPG-19K-N group), 150 mu g/kg HHPG-19Ksingle injection (HHPG-19K-H group) and 5 mu g/kg G-CSF daily injection (G-CSF group) at day 3 of the second cycle (cycle 2) chemotherapy. The primary endpoint was incidence of grade >= 3 neutropenia during cycle 2. Study drug-related adverse events during cycle 2 were recorded for safety assessment.
    Results: During cycle 2 chemotherapy, both HHPG-19K-N and HHPG-19K-H groups exhibited lower incidence of grade >= 3 neutropenia compared with G-CSF group, while no difference was observed between HHPG-19K-N and HHPG-19K-H groups. Also, better outcomes were observed in HHPG-19K-N and HHPG-19K-H groups compared with G-CSF group regarding to grade 4 neutropenia, duration of grade >= 3 neutropenia, duration of grade 4 neutropenia, incidence of febrile neutropenia (FN) and rescue application of G-CSF, time to ANC recovery, while no difference of these outcomes between HHPG-19K-N and HHPG-19K-H groups was observed. For safety analysis, the incidences of hematologic and non-hematologic adverse events were similar among the 3 groups.
    Conclusions: HHPG-19K presents with better clinical efficacy as well as equal tolerance compared with G-CSF in treating chemotherapy-induced neutropenia in breast cancer patients.

  • 推荐引用方式
    GB/T 7714:
    Wang Tao,Wu Biao,Hui Xichun, et al. A randomized multicenter phase II trial of mecapegfilgrastim single administration versus granulocyte colony-stimulating growth factor on treating chemotherapy-induced neutropenia in breast cancer patients [J].ANNALS OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE,2019,7(9).
  • APA:
    Wang Tao,Wu Biao,Hui Xichun,Liu Jinping,&Jiang Zefei.(2019).A randomized multicenter phase II trial of mecapegfilgrastim single administration versus granulocyte colony-stimulating growth factor on treating chemotherapy-induced neutropenia in breast cancer patients .ANNALS OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE,7(9).
  • MLA:
    Wang Tao, et al. "A randomized multicenter phase II trial of mecapegfilgrastim single administration versus granulocyte colony-stimulating growth factor on treating chemotherapy-induced neutropenia in breast cancer patients" .ANNALS OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE 7,9(2019).
浏览次数:5 下载次数:0
浏览次数:5
下载次数:0
打印次数:0
浏览器支持: Google Chrome   火狐   360浏览器极速模式(8.0+极速模式) 
返回顶部