首页 / 院系成果 / 成果详情页

Dosimetric quality of HyperArc in boost radiotherapy for single glioblastoma: comparison with CyberKnife and manual VMAT  期刊论文  

  • 编号:
    883B694BF555F71B2E326B639EF74305
  • 作者:
    Pan, Mingyuan[1,2,3] Xu, Wenqian[1,2,3] Sun, Lei[1,2,3] Wang, Chaozhuang[1,2,3] Dong, Shengnan[1,2,3] Guan, Yun[1,2,3] Yang, Jun[4] Wang, Enmin[1,2,3]
  • 语种:
    英文
  • 期刊:
    RADIATION ONCOLOGY ISSN:1748-717X 2023 年 18 卷 1 期 ; JAN 10
  • 收录:
  • 关键词:
  • 摘要:

    Background Stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) and hypo-fractionated radiotherapy are feasible treatment options for single glioblastoma multiforme when combined with conventional radiotherapy or delivered alone. HyperArc (HA), a novel linac-based method with 4 noncoplanar arcs, has been introduced into stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for single and multiple metastases. In this study, we compared the dosimetric quality of HyperArc with the well-established CyberKnife (CK) and conventional VMAT methods of SRT for a single, large target.Methods Sixteen patients treated in our center with their clinical CK plans were enrolled, and the linac-based plans were designed in silico. From the aspect of normal tissue protection and treatment efficacy, we compared the conformity index (CI), gradient index (GI), homogeneity index (HI), dose distribution in planning target volume, dose in the normal brain tissue, and mean dose of several organs at risk (OARs). All of the data were evaluated with nonparametric Kruskal?Wallis tests. We further investigated the relationship of the dose distribution with the tumor volume and its location.Results The results showed that with a higher CI (0.94 +/- 0.03) and lower GI (2.57 +/- 0.53), the HA plans generated a lower dose to the OARs and the normal tissue. Meanwhile, the CK plans achieved a higher HI (0.35 +/- 0.10) and generated a higher dose inside the tumor. Although manual VMAT showed slight improvement in dose quality and less monitoring units (2083 +/- 225), HA can save half of the delivery time of CK (37 minutes) on average.Conclusion HA plans have higher conformity and spare OARs with lower normal tissue irradiation, while CK plans achieve a higher mean dose in tumors. HA with 4 arcs is sufficient in dosimetric quality for a single tumor with great convenience in planning and treatment processes compared with conventional VMAT. The tumor size and location are factors to be considered when selecting treatment equipment.

  • 推荐引用方式
    GB/T 7714:
    Pan Mingyuan,Xu Wenqian,Sun Lei, et al. Dosimetric quality of HyperArc in boost radiotherapy for single glioblastoma: comparison with CyberKnife and manual VMAT [J].RADIATION ONCOLOGY,2023,18(1).
  • APA:
    Pan Mingyuan,Xu Wenqian,Sun Lei,Wang Chaozhuang,&Wang Enmin.(2023).Dosimetric quality of HyperArc in boost radiotherapy for single glioblastoma: comparison with CyberKnife and manual VMAT .RADIATION ONCOLOGY,18(1).
  • MLA:
    Pan Mingyuan, et al. "Dosimetric quality of HyperArc in boost radiotherapy for single glioblastoma: comparison with CyberKnife and manual VMAT" .RADIATION ONCOLOGY 18,1(2023).
  • 入库时间:
    2025/2/19 19:32:10
  • 更新时间:
    2025/2/21 12:42:40
浏览次数:3 下载次数:0
浏览次数:3
下载次数:0
打印次数:0
浏览器支持: Google Chrome   火狐   360浏览器极速模式(8.0+极速模式) 
返回顶部